1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 25 N.J.
  5. 25 N.J. 293 (1957)
 

VARGAS v. A.H. BULL STEAMSHIP CO.

25 N.J. 293 (1957)

135 A.2d 857

ANGEL PAIN VARGAS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. A.H. BULL STEAMSHIP CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT. FELIPE ALMESTICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. BALTIMORE INSULAR LINE, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT. JUAN ECMEVARRIA RODRIGUEZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. A.H. BULL STEAMSHIP CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 12, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis J. Greenberg argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant and cross-respondent (Mr. Samuel M. Cole, attorney).

Mr. Nicholas Conover English argued the cause for defendants-respondents and cross-appellants (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The basic questions involved in this appeal were dealt with comprehensively by Judge Gaulkin in the Law Division of the Superior Court. The dismissal is affirmed for the reasons stated by him and reported in 44 N.J.Super. 536 (Law Div. 1957).

In addition to arguing the merits of the issues involved, cross-appellants question the legal propriety of the counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases