NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SWIFT & COMPANY

No. 15051.

240 F.2d 65 (1957)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SWIFT & COMPANY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

January 7, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, John E. Jay, Attorneys, NLRB, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Marion B. Plant, Moses Lasky, Bailey Lang, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before HEALY, POPE and LEMMON, Circuit Judges.


HEALY, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S. C.A. § 151 et seq. for enforcement of a Board order directing respondent Swift & Company to bargain with a local of Amalgamated Meat Cutters Union as the duly certified representative of respondent's plant clerks and standard checkers at its South San Francisco plant. Respondent refused to comply with the direction on the ground that these workers are confidential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases