1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 5 Misc.2d
  5. 5 Misc.2d 24 (1957)
 

PIKE v. ROELL

5 Misc.2d 24 (1957)

David Pike et al., Copartners Doing Business as David Pike Assocs., Appellants, v. Walter Roell et al., Defendants, and Harry Berman, Doing Business as Dale Realty Co., Respondent. David Pike et al., Copartners, Doing Business as David Pike Assocs., Appellants, v. Walter Roell et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

January 10, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Friedman for appellants.

Alexander Berman for Harry Berman, doing business as Dale Realty Co., respondent.

Louis J. Castellano for Walter Roell and another, respondents.

PETTE, HART and DI GIOVANNA, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

The judgment and order dismissing plaintiffs' amended complaint as to defendant Berman should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $10 costs to plaintiffs as against that defendant, and motion denied. Appeal from order granting motion of defendants Walter and Matilda Roell to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them, dismissed, without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases