HARKINS v. DEL POZZI

No. 34061.

50 Wn.2d 237 (1957)

310 P.2d 532

WILLIAM H. HARKINS, Respondent, v. FRANK DEL POZZI et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

May 2, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ostrander, Van Eaton & Hepfer, for appellants.

Leo W. Stewart, for respondent.


OTT, J.

This is an action to quiet title. It presents but a single primary question: Where is the proper boundary line between second-class tidelands owned by one person and the adjacent uplands owned by another?

The cause was tried to the court. It determined the line of ordinary high tide as of the year 1910, and that it was relatively unchanged at the present time; that there was insufficient substantial or reliable evidence to establish the line of ordinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases