IN RE PURVIS

No. C.D. 2022.

51 Wn.2d 206 (1957)

316 P.2d 1081

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against RALPH E. PURVIS, an Attorney at Law.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 31, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T.M. Royce, for board of governors.

Brodie & Fristoe, for respondent.


DONWORTH, J.

The Washington state bar association, by its complaint, verified by its president, charged respondent, Ralph E. Purvis, with violation of his oath and duties as an attorney at law and of the ethics of the profession. No specific canon of ethics nor ground for disciplinary action (Rule for Discipline of Attorneys 10, 34A Wn. (2d) 183) is referred to in the complaint. Respondent, as a member of the bar of this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases