1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 2 Wis.2d
  5. 2 Wis.2d 253 (1957)
 

VENDEN v. MEISEL

2 Wis.2d 253 (1957)

VENDEN, Respondent, vs. MEISEL and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 5, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Rogers & Owens of Portage, and oral argument by Bruce J. Rogers.

For the respondent there was a brief by Langer & Cross of Baraboo, and oral argument by Clyde C. Cross.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Concededly, farm labor was being performed and the theory of plaintiff's cause of action was common-law negligence. Appellants urge the following propositions:

1. Venden should be found as a matter of law to have assumed the risk;

2. There was insufficient evidence of negligence on the part of Meisel;

3. It should be determined as a matter of law that Venden's negligence was equal to or greater than that of Meisel; and,

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases