1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 241 F.2d
  5. 241 F.2d 6 (1957)
 

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION v. BLOCK DRUG CO.

No. 11605.

241 F.2d 6 (1957)

The UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BLOCK DRUG CO., Amm-i-dent, Inc., and F. W. Woolworth Co., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 18, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin B. Schneider, Chicago, Ill., Robert S. Dunham, William R. Liberman, New York City, Robert L. Broderick, East St. Louis, Ill., and R. Howard Goldsmith, Chicago, Ill., for appellants. Schneider, Dressler & Goldsmith, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Charles J. Merriam, Chicago, Ill., Harold G. Baker, East St. Louis, Ill., Robert F. Monaghan, Hugh M. Matchett, John Rex Allen, Chicago, Ill., for appellee. Merriam & Lorch, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Before MAJOR, FINNEGAN and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges.

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action alleging infringement of two patents: No. 2,542,886, entitled "Dentifrice," granted February 20, 1951, to Edward C. Wach, and No. 2,622,058, entitled "Ammoniated Dentifrice," granted December 16, 1952, to Robert G. Kesel. (The former will hereinafter be referred to as the Wach and the latter as the Kesel patent.) Plaintiff, The University of Illinois Foundation, acquired the patents by assignment from Wach and Kesel. Both patents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases