1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.H.
  4. 101 N.H.
  5. 101 N.H. 108 (1957)
 

DUHAMEL v. PRESCOTT

No. 4577.

101 N.H. 108 (1957)

YVONICK DUHAMEL & a v. JOHN O. PRESCOTT & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided September 30, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard I. Snierson and John P. Chandler (Mr. Chandler orally), for the plaintiffs.

Upton, Sanders & Upton (Mr. Richard F. Upton orally), for the defendants John O. and Samuel J. Prescott.

WHEELER, J.

The master found that when the plaintiffs discussed purchase of the property, they were fully aware of the existing restrictions and that they purchased relying upon the statement of Ellsworth Eddy that John O. Prescott, by an instrument dated June 1, 1954, had released the restrictions. It was further found that after execution Eddy had inserted, without authorization of either party, a clause in this instrument which purported to remove the restrictions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases