BRODER v. BRASSELLE


7 Misc.2d 13 (1957)

I. Robert Broder, Plaintiff, v. Keefe Brasselle, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

March 7, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Robert Broder, plaintiff in person.

Brower, Brill & Gangel for defendant.


MATTHEW M. LEVY, J.

The plaintiff moves, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike the second affirmative defense for insufficiency, or, in the alternative, pursuant to rule 103, to strike the allegations thereof as scandalous, irrelevant and unnecessary. The plaintiff also moves, pursuant to rule 109, for dismissal of the counterclaim for insufficiency.

The suit is in two causes of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases