WERBLUD v. MEHADRIN DAIRY CORP.


11 Misc.2d 167 (1957)

Nathan Werblud, Plaintiff, v. Mehadrin Dairy Corporation et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

December 9, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Heisler for Mehadrin Dairy Corporation, defendant.

Goodstein & Moed for Kahal Dairy Company, defendant.

Max Blecher, Jr., for plaintiff.


BENJAMIN BRENNER, J.

Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the ground that the three causes of action set forth in the amended complaint are legally insufficient.

The first cause of action is one for fraud and deceit. It alleges in substance that defendant Mehadrin Dairy Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Mehadrin), in order to prevent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases