BARBARISI EX REL. BARBARISI v. CARUSO


47 N.J. Super. 125 (1957)

135 A.2d 539

DENNIS BARBARISI, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GILDA BARBARISI, AND GILDA BARBARISI AND ANTHONY BARBARISI, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MARY CARUSO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 22, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph M. Rotolo argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Rotolo & Rotolo, attorneys; Mr. Joseph M. Rotolo, of counsel).

Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Mr. Breslin, attorney and of counsel; Mr. William J. Scanlon, on the brief).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

This action was instituted on behalf of Dennis Barbarisi, an infant now 9 years of age, by his mother as guardian ad litem, and by the infant's parents per quod, to recover for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of future earnings. The complaint is based on failure to exercise reasonable care in the assumed duty to care for and supervise the infant plaintiff. At the conclusion

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases