1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 2 Wis.2d
  5. 2 Wis.2d 160 (1957)
 

SCHNEIDER v. NEUMAN

2 Wis.2d 160 (1957)

SCHNEIDER, by Guardian ad litEm, and another, Appellants, vs. NEUMAN and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 5, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by E. W. Hooker, and oral argument by Mr. Hooker and by Mr. L. V. Kaminski, both of Waupun.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Robert G. Hartman of Juneau.

WINGERT, J.

The judgment must be affirmed.

1. Negligence issue. Was Neuman negligent as a matter of law in failing to see Yvonne? We think not. Neuman admitted that he was looking straight ahead and did not see the little girl. Appellants contend that the child cannot have traveled very rapidly from the curb to the point of impact with defendant's car; that she had to cross at least 18 feet of open street, even if she came out from behind a parked car...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases