1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 2 Wis.2d
  5. 2 Wis.2d 138 (1957)
 

STEINFELDT v. PIERCE

2 Wis.2d 138 (1957)

STEINFELDT, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. PIERCE and others, Defendants HERMAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 5, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Thiel, Allan & Storck of Mayville, and oral argument by Lloyd Allan.

For the respondent there was a brief by Callahan & Arnold of Columbus, and oral argument by Carroll B. Callahan.

MARTIN, C. J.

When the trial court reduced the damages awarded by the jury in the first trial, it gave to the defendants the option of permitting the entry of judgment on the verdict as so amended "or, by default of exercise of such option within twenty days from the filing of this decision, to thereby request a new trial.... A new trial will concern damages only."

The damages not disturbed by the court's decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases