LUM v. HEE KWONG ET AL.

No. 3033.

42 Haw. 87 (1957)

YIN TAI LUM v. HEE KWONG, HEE YOUNG, HEE YEE, HEE HAU, NG SHEONG HEE, HEE HOP, AND L. KOON CHAN, LIMITED.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

Decided September 12, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Russell Cades and Robert G. Dodge (Heen, Kai, Dodge & Lum on the opening brief; Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades with them on the reply brief) for appellants.

Frank D. Padgett (Robertson, Castle & Anthony with him on the brief) for appellee.

RICE, C.J., MARUMOTO, J., AND CIRCUIT JUDGE WIRTZ IN PLACE OF STAINBACK, J., DISQUALIFIED.


OPINION OF THE COURT BY MARUMOTO, J.

This is an appeal by respondents from the final decree of a circuit judge which decreed that individual respondents Hee Kwong, Hee Young, Hee Yee, Hee Hau, Ng Sheong Hee and Hee Hop pay $21,660.54 to corporate respondent L. Koon Chan, Limited, and that the corporate respondent pay to petitioner's counsel, out of the payment made by individual respondents, $7,000 as counsel fee and $190.70 for costs incurred on behalf of petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases