HOENIG v. NEWMARK


306 S.W.2d 838 (1957)

Henry HOENIG et al., Appellants, v. John NEWMARK et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

November 1, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward W. Bensinger, Louisville, for appellants.

T. Kennedy Helm, Jr., and Stites, Wood, Helm & Peabody, James E. Thornberry, Louisville, for appellees, Lucile Pledge Gillespie and Jean Pledge Roth.

Eli H. Brown, III, and Edward S. Bonnie, Louisville, for appellee, University of Louisville.


WADDILL, Commissioner.

The appeal is from a judgment declaring a portion of the residuary clause of the will of Lucile Newmark void for uncertainty and directing distribution of the residue of the estate to certain beneficiaries in accordance with an alternate provision of the will. Appellants, who are the executors and trustees under the will, urge that the residuary clause of Miss Newmark's will points out with reasonable certainty the beneficiaries and the purpose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases