1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 83 Ariz.
  5. 83 Ariz. 27 (1957)
 

LOVELACE v. CLARK

No. 1100.

83 Ariz. 27 (1957)

315 P.2d 876

Curtis Weldon LOVELACE, Petitioner, v. James W. CLARK, Sheriff of Pima County, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

September 27, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence E. Ackels, Dallas, Tex., and Lawrence Ollason, Tucson, for petitioner.

Robert Morrison, Atty. Gen., J.H. Green, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Raul H. Castro, County Atty. of Pima County, H.E. Rogge, Jr., Chief Deputy County Atty., Pima County, Tuscon, for respondent.

UDALL, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal is: "Did the trial court err in dismissing the writ of habeas corpus because the statute in question, A.R.S. Section 13-652, defining lewd and lascivious acts and fixing a penalty therefor, is violative of the due process clause of the State Constitution (article 2, section 4, A.R.S.), and of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?", the precise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases