1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 10 Misc.2d
  5. 10 Misc.2d 1040 (1957)
 

MAJESTIC LOOSE LEAF, INC. v. CANNIZZARO

10 Misc.2d 1040 (1957)

Majestic Loose Leaf, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Dominick Cannizzaro et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

December 9, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Block for defendants.

Smith & Reiher for plaintiffs.

ANTHONY J. DI GIOVANNA, J.

Motions to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for legal insufficiency and for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

The amended complaint contains two causes of action. The first, by all the plaintiffs against both defendants, alleges that plaintiffs Majestic Loose Leaf, Inc., and The Camille Company, Inc., are domestic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases