1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 156 F.Supp.
  5. 156 F.Supp. 883 (1957)
 

WOLFE v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY

No. 29177.

156 F.Supp. 883 (1957)

Bernard M. WOLFE and Frederick J. Dannenfelser, individuals and copartners, doing business under the names and styles "Dutch Paint Company" and "Manning-Mitchell Paint Company", Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. California, S. D.

October 30, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Alioto, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff Wolfe.

Vladimir Vucinich, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff Dannenfelser.

Robert E. Burns, San Francisco, Cal. (James D. Ewing, Milton Handler and John B. Henrich, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

EDWARD P. MURPHY, District Judge.

The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found plaintiffs guilty of trademark infringement and unfair competition, and ordered an accounting of plaintiffs' profits and a determination of defendant's damages. National Lead Company v. Wolfe, 1955, 223 F.2d 195. In accordance with these directions, a hearing has been held and briefs have been filed. I have carefully considered all relevant evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases