ROGERS v. ROGERS


19 Misc.2d 996 (1957)

Violet Rogers, Plaintiff, v. James S. Rogers, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Kings County.

May 16, 1957.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney L. Aronson and Gerald Adler for plaintiff.

Murty J. O'Connor for defendant.


LOUIS L. FRIEDMAN, J.

This is a separation action wherein defendant has interposed an answer in which he has asserted four separate and complete defenses, and a counterclaim. Plaintiff now moves to strike out paragraphs 5 to 14 of said answer containing said defenses, and also seeks to strike paragraphs 15 through 19 of the answer, which is a counterclaim for annulment. The basis for said motion is that said defenses, consisting of new matter, are insufficient...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases