We agree with the Appellate Division that the admission of evidence relating to the Orsino transaction, and as to the statement made by defendant's wife, was error. In our view, these errors affected defendant's substantial rights, and may not be disregarded on the ground that the evidence of defendant's guilt is convincing, or that the right result has been reached (People v. Ochs,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DZIOBECKI
3 N.Y.2d 997 (1957)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alexander M. Dziobecki, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued October 18, 1957.
Decided December 6, 1957.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE concur.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
