HUGHES v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 10831.

144 F.Supp. 855 (1956)

James E. HUGHES & Elizabeth Hughes, v. UNITED STATES of America.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

October 10, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Coudert Brothers, New York City, by James E. Hughes, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Leonard P. Moore, U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., by Robert Manuel, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for the United States.


RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. The defendant cross-moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The undisputed facts follow:

The plaintiff, James E. Hughes, hereinafter called the taxpayer, is an attorney in the employ of the law firm of Coudert Brothers. His employment commenced on August 19, 1935, and on January 1, 1945, he became a partner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases