1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 144 Cal.App.2d
  5. 144 Cal.App.2d Supp. 849 (1956)
 

SCHMIDT v. NEW PLASTIC CORP.

Docket No. 9054.

144 Cal.App.2d Supp. 849 (1956)

301 P.2d 131

FLORENCE LEE SCHMIDT, Appellant, v. NEW PLASTIC CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

August 28, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sallie T. Seaver for Appellant.

Murchison & Cumming for Respondent.

BISHOP, P.J.

Plaintiff sought in vain to recover for services rendered under a contract repudiated, during its life, by the defendant. We have not had the benefit of findings, nor of any opinion by the trial court, to indicate to us the theory on which its judgment was based. As we should do (Estate of Rule (1944), 25 Cal.2d 1, 10 [152 P.2d 1003, 1007, 155 A.L.R. 1319]) we made the best use of the evidence that we could, to support the judgment, but nevertheless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases