Judgments reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial ordered.
We may not find that appellant Campbell was an accomplice merely because he was with appellant Rhodes before the alleged larceny was committed, was at the scene when it was committed, and left the scene with Rhodes after it had been committed. (People v. Ligouri, 284 N.Y. 309; People v. Baldiseno, 266 App. Div. 909; People v. Weiss, 290 N.Y. 160; People v. Jackson, 291...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.