1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 301 P.2d
  5. 301 P.2d 677 (1956)
 

KIOWA COUNTY EXCISE BD. v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY. CO.

No. 37194.

301 P.2d 677 (1956)

KIOWA COUNTY EXCISE BOARD, Plaintiff in Error, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY. COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Dissenting Opinion July 31, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd Reeder, County Atty., Kiowa County, Hobart, Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., J.H. Johnson and James C. Harkin, Asst. Attys. Gen., for plaintiff in error.

G.E. Bailey, St. Louis, Mo., Satterfield, Franklin & Harmon, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.

Charles B. Duffy, Ponca City, for Ponca City Board of Education, amicus curiae.

Walter A. Lybrand, Oklahoma City, for Oklahoma City Board of Education, amicus curiae.

Claude H. Rosenstein, Tulsa, for Tulsa Board of Education, amicus curiae.

JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

The Court of Tax Review sustained a protest by the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, against 1.61 mills of a total ad valorem tax levy of 25 mills made to finance the general fund of Independent School District No. 4 of Kiowa County for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1956. The Kiowa County Excise Board appeals.

The facts are not in dispute. A 25 mill levy was made for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases