JOY MANUFACTURING CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INT. REV.

No. 11696.

230 F.2d 740 (1956)

JOY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided February 29, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold R. Schmidt, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Don Rose, Rose, Rose & Houston, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

David O. Walter, Washington, D. C., (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

In determining a deficiency in the 1949 income tax of Joy Manufacturing Company, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue ruled that a disputed item of $120,277 constituted income accrued to the taxpayer during the taxable year for certain engineering services. The Tax Court sustained that ruling and the taxpayer has asked us to review the decision.

There is no serious disagreement about the essential facts as found by the Tax Court. Joy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases