SIEGEL v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.


3 Misc.2d 963 (1956)

David Siegel, an Infant, by Rhoda Siegel, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

May 11, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton A. Gasoi for plaintiffs.

Julius H. Sherman for defendant.


LOUIS L. FRIEDMAN, J.

In this action, plaintiffs, mother and son, sue on two causes of action. The son, the infant plaintiff herein, sues to recover through his mother as his guardian, for personal injuries sustained by him as a result of his hand being caught and drawn into "an automatic electric clothes wringer device" which was on display and in operation in defendant's store. He charges the defendant with negligence. The mother asserts a separate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases