DAHLGREN v. BLOMEEN

No. 33425.

49 Wn.2d 47 (1956)

298 P.2d 479

MAMIE DAHLGREN, as Executrix, Appellant, v. CARL A. BLOMEEN, Respondent. CARL A. BLOMEEN, Respondent, v. MAMIE DAHLGREN, Appellant.[]

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

May 31, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elliott, Lee, Carney & Thomas, for appellant.

Walthew, Oseran & Warner, for respondent.


ROSELLINI, J.

This is an appeal from a decree in favor of the respondent, Carl Blomeen, impressing a lien upon the net estate of Ellen S. Ross, deceased. The appellant, Mamie Dahlgren, is executrix and residuary legatee under the will of Ellen S. Ross.

The lien imposed by the trial court was based upon two findings: first, that the parties had entered into an oral agreement to make and maintain mutual wills; and second, that the decedent had executed a written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases