CAUDLE v. CITY OF NEW YORK


5 Misc.2d 941 (1956)

Charles Caudle, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

November 29, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (Abraham Satran of counsel), for appellant.

John A. Murray for respondent.

HOFSTADTER, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

No reasonable excuse for the failure to prosecute the action with diligence was shown. In the circumstances, the denial of the motion to dismiss for failure to proceed with diligence was an improvident exercise of discretion (Hyde & Sons v. Roller Derby Skate Co., 1 A.D.2d 942).

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases