STATE v. EDMUNDSON

No. 290.

94 S.E.2d 844 (1956)

244 N.C. 693

STATE v. Claude EDMUNDSON, Harvey Barfield, McKinley Braswell and Lee Harvey.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 31, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmundson & Edmundson, Goldsboro, for defendants-appellants.

George B. Patton, Atty. Gen., Samuel Behrends, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


PER CURIAM.

Defendants challenge the ruling of the trial court in denying their motions made in Superior Court for judgment as of nonsuit. Suffice it to say, in this connection, the Court holds the evidence offered by the State, taken in the light most favorable to the State, as is done when considering demurrer to the evidence, G. S. § 15-173, is sufficient to take the case to the jury and to support the verdict of guilty as to each defendant. See State v. Jaynes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases