1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 273 Wis.
  5. 273 Wis. 648 (1956)
 

DeBYLE v. ROBERTS

273 Wis. 648 (1956)

DeBYLE and wife, Respondents, vs. ROBERTS and wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 7, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Hebert & Smith of Tomahawk, and oral argument by Robert G. Hebert.

For the respondents there was a brief by O'Melia & Kaye of Rhinelander, and oral argument by Walter F. Kaye.

BROADFOOT, J.

We agree with the trial court that Eugene Olszewski, by selling with reference to maps and drawings and by reason of the representations he made that parcel C was and would remain a road, had evidenced an intention to dedicate the same for public use as a road and that it was accepted by public user thereof. Under these findings there was a common-law dedication and acceptance of parcel C as a roadway. See ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases