PER CURIAM.
After our opinion in the above case, the respondents requested and received permission to file a motion for leave to reargue. In support of their contention that justice requires a reargument, they claim substantially that the evidence concerning the complainants' use of the driveway was entirely undisputed; that it shows such use was always with permission of the respondents and their predecessors in title; and that therefore such use was not adverse...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
