1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 146 Cal.App.2d
  5. 146 Cal.App.2d 752 (1956)
 

PAC. GAS ETC. CO. v. SHASTA DAM UTIL. DIST.

Docket Nos. 9167, 9168.

146 Cal.App.2d 752 (1956)

304 P.2d 862

PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Appellants, v. SHASTA DAM AREA PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT et al., Respondents. (Two Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

December 13, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Love, Robert L. Pierce, Richard H. Peterson, Frederick W. Mielke, Jr., and Herbert A. Waterman for Appellants.

Daniel S. Carlton for Respondents.

SCHOTTKY, J.

Respondents in each of the above entitled actions filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in each case upon the ground that the appeal in each case is sham, frivolous and without merit, and taken for the purpose of delay. Upon the hearing of the motions it was stipulated by the parties that the motions and the merits of the appeal be submitted together and that additional points and authorities be filed by respective counsel.

[1] The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases