1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.
  4. 309 N.Y.
  5. 309 N.Y. 581 (1956)
 

CONNOLLY v. BELL

309 N.Y. 581 (1956)

David J. Connolly et al., as Receivers to Collect a Judgment in Favor of Burlington County Bridge Commission, et al., Respondents, v. Robert K. Bell et al., Defendants, and Theodore R. Hanff et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 17, 1956

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick W. R. Pride, Donald J. Nugent and Robert M. Lane for appellants.

A. Donald MacKinnon, Rebecca M. Cutler and Michael F. Orr for respondents.

William J. McDonald, Jr., Charles S. Bannerman and Covington Hardee for B. J. Van Ingen & Co., Inc., amicus curiæ, in support of respondents' position.

DESMOND, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., concur with CONWAY, Ch. J.; DYE, J., taking no part.

CONWAY, Ch. J.

This is an action upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of New Jersey. The following is a summary of the background of the litigation.

Sometime during 1946 a group of men — the defendants Bell, Christensen, Hanff, Ketcham, Nongard, Parks and Clifford R. Powell (but not the partnership of Ketcham & Nongard as such, and not the individual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases