1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 139 Cal.App.2d
  5. 139 Cal.App.2d 751 (1956)
 

SMIDT v. OVERHOLTZER

Docket No. 8723.

139 Cal.App.2d 751 (1956)

294 P.2d 64

W.P. SMIDT, Respondent, v. A.E. OVERHOLTZER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 8, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard B. Crittenden for Appellant.

Dilley & Eymann and George E. Dilley for Respondent.

PEEK, J.

By his complaint plaintiff sought recovery for the alleged conversion of certain machinery and compensatory as well as exemplary damages. Defendant, by his cross-complaint, also claimed conversion of the same equipment as well as one additional item, and likewise claimed both compensatory and exemplary damages. Further damages were sought for injuries to electrical wiring on defendant's property. The court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases