1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 273 Wis.
  5. 273 Wis. 605 (1956)
 

ROELVINK v. MILWAUKEE

273 Wis. 605 (1956)

ROELVINK and wife, Appellants, vs. CITY OF MILWAUKEE and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 7, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Charles Saggio, Brooke Tibbs, and Howard H. Boyle, Jr., all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Boyle.

For the respondents there was a brief by Walter J. Mattison, city attorney, and Alan H. Steinmetz and Carl F. Kinnel, assistant city attorneys, and oral argument by Mr. Steinmetz.

BROADFOOT, J.

The amended complaint herein contains four separate causes of action. The first cause of action is based on allegations that the agent for the city had made threats to condemn the property if the plaintiffs did not voluntarily sell the same to the city, and that they conveyed said real estate by reason of threats and coercion. Each of the other causes of action realleges the material parts of the first cause of action.

The second cause of action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases