GARDNER, P. J.
This case turns mainly, if not entirely, on questions of facts and construction of the combination policy involved. One of the questions involved is whether or not the court erred in allowing the amendment marked "New Exhibit A" to be substituted for the original Exhibit A. This exhibit was a combination automobile policy. The provision of paragraph 22 has no bearing and does not control the terms of the 12 months' policy. In our view paragraph 22 of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
