MEAD v. STATE


86 So.2d 773 (1956)

Ralph MEAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B.

April 11, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin & Martin, Plant City, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and David U. Tumin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


THOMAS, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of grand larceny, was adjudged guilty of that crime, and was sentenced to serve five years in the State penitentiary. He maintains here that error committed in his trial was so prejudicial that he should be tried anew. We will discuss and decide in the order in which they are argued in his brief the first two questions he presents for our decision.

When the appellant was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases