1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 271 Wis.
  5. 271 Wis. 587 (1956)
 

STURM v. SIMPSON'S GARMENT CO.

271 Wis. 587 (1956)

STURM, Respondent, vs. SIMPSON'S GARMENT COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 10, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Toebaas, Hart, Kraege & Jackman of Madison, and oral argument by Oscar T. Toebaas.

For the respondent there was a brief by Spohn, Ross, Stevens, Lamb & Pick, attorneys, and Frank A. Ross, Jr., of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by Frank A. Ross, Jr.

CURRIE, J.

The principal contention raised in behalf of the appellant Simpson's on this appeal is that the evidence does not support the verdict and judgment.

It is not unusual in cases of this kind for the evidence to be in sharp conflict on certain points, and such proved to be the case in the course of the instant trial. However, in passing upon the issue of whether the evidence supports the verdict it is only necessary to consider such testimony and exhibits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases