Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
It was an improvident exercise of discretion, resulting in prejudice to appellant, to permit respondents, in June, 1956, to amend their original answer, served in September, 1951, so as to withdraw their admission of maintenance and control. Moreover, respondents had knowledge of the claim that the third-party defendant maintained and controlled the premises in question, as shown by their third-party...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
