NONGARD v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COM'N

No. 11733.

229 F.2d 622 (1956)

Richard C. NONGARD, Ellen Ketcham, as Executrix of the Estate of Tuthill Ketcham, Deceased, and Rowland H. Murray, Individually and as Partners Trading as Ketcham & Nongard, Appellants, v. BURLINGTON COUNTY BRIDGE COMMISSION, a Body Politic; David J. Connelly and William H. Wells, as Receivers, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided February 3, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Egan, Philadelphia, Pa. (Vincent L. Gallaher, Camden, N. J., on the brief), for appellants.

Walter D. Van Riper, Newark, N. J. (Van Riper & Belmont, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for receivers.

Robert L. Hood, Newark, N. J. (Thomas D. Begley, Burlington, N. J., on the brief), for Burlington County Bridge Commission.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action, appellants here, are a Chicago brokerage and trading firm, Ketcham & Nongard, and the three individuals who are its members. They have sued Burlington County Bridge Commission, a corporate public agency of the State of New Jersey, and David Connelly and William Wells, receivers appointed by the Superior Court of New Jersey to collect from these plaintiffs and others personal money judgments entered against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases