1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 273 Wis.
  5. 273 Wis. 568 (1956)
 

BURMEISTER v. DAMROW

273 Wis. 568 (1956)

BURMEISTER, Appellant, vs. DAMROW and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 7, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by George H. Murwin and Cleland P. Fisher, both of Janesville.

For the respondents there was a brief by Thronson, Roethe & Agnew of Janesville, and oral argument by John T. Roethe and Ernest P. Agnew.

STEINLE, J.

The facts established by undisputed evidence of record are as follows: The defendant, E. H. Damrow, is the father of the defendant, John E. Damrow. Both are chiropractors. The son was an employee of the father in a chiropractic clinic conducted at the residence of the father on Center avenue near the city of Janesville. In 1949 the father began the construction of a new office building upon property where his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases