1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 243 F.2d
  5. 243 F.2d 593 (1956)
 

UNITED STEELWORKERS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD.

Nos. 12754, 12812.

243 F.2d 593 (1956)

UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Nutone, Incorporated, Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NUTONE, Incorporated, Respondent, United Steelworkers of America, CIO, Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided November 23, 1956.

Writ of Certiorari Granted April 1, 1957.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur J. Goldberg, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. David E. Feller, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 12754 and intervenor in No. 12812.

Mr. Arnold Ordman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, was on the brief, for respondent in No. 12754 and petitioner in No. 12812. Miss Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for respondent in No. 12754 and petitioner in No. 12812.

Mr. Charles A. Atwood, Cincinnati, Ohio, for intervenor in No. 12754 and respondent in No. 12812. Mr. Thomas E. Shroyer, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for intervenor in No. 12754 and respondent in No. 12812.

Before PRETTYMAN, WILBUR K. MILLER, and BASTIAN, Circuit Judges.

Writ of Certiorari Granted April 1, 1957. See 77 S.Ct. 682.

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

These two cases come here from the National Labor Relations Board. The United Steelworkers of America began in the spring of 1953 a campaign to organize the employees of Nutone, Incorporated, a manufacturing concern of Cincinnati, Ohio. The campaign was heated but not violent. The ensuing election was lost by the Steelworkers, and shortly thereafter an unaffiliated union...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases