PLUCHINO v. PLUCHINO


1 A.D.2d 831 (1956)

Joseph Pluchino, Respondent, v. Dorothea Pluchino, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 6, 1956


Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

There is no direct allegation that respondent represented that a valid marriage could be contracted in New York without modification of the decree. We shall assume that the counterclaim alleges that such a false statement was made. (See, e.g., Haviland v. Halstead, 34 N.Y. 643, and Kastner v. Stein, 130 Misc. 840.) To hold that such counterclaim is good as a pleading would be contrary to the public...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases