The single question upon this appeal is, whether appellee, H. T. Day, had acquired vested rights in lands which were impaired by the 1944 amendment to KRS 56.190, thereby making the amendment unconstitutional insofar as it was retroactive. The trial judge held Day had acquired vested rights in certain lands prior to the amendment and the retroactive feature in the application thereof impaired such rights, hence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
