PETTY v. CRANSTON PRINT WORKS COMPANY

No. 245.

90 S.E.2d 717 (1956)

243 N.C. 292

Horace B. PETTY v. CRANSTON PRINT WORKS COMPANY, a corporation.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 13, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. T. Carswell and Robinson & Jones, Charlotte, for plaintiff, appellant.

Carpenter & Webb, Charlotte, for defendant, appellee.


BOBBITT, Justice.

The facts disclosed by the evidence impel the conclusion that judgment of involuntary nonsuit was proper.

To recover damages for actionable negligence, plaintiff must establish (1) a legal duty, (2) a breach thereof, and (3) injury proximately caused by such breach. Ramsbottom v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., 138 N.C. 38, 41, 50 S.E. 448. Plaintiff's action is in tort. Even so, the duty owed by defendant to plaintiff arises from

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases