BRICE v. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.


272 Wis. 520 (1956)

BRICE, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Respondents, vs. MILWAUKEE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 3, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by McCue & Regan of Milwaukee, and Evrard, Evrard, Duffy, Holman & Faulds of Green Bay, and oral argument by James R. Faulds.

For the respondents there was a brief by Reynolds, Bittner & Reynolds of Green Bay, and oral argument by Robert L. Bittner.


CURRIE, J.

The defendants raise the following three issues on this appeal:

(1) There is no credible evidence to support the jury's finding of negligence as to lookout on the part of the defendant Beverly Reimer.

(2) The negligence of the plaintiff Dorothy Brice was equal to or greater than the negligence of Beverly Reimer.

(3) The trial court committed error in its instructions to the jury.

Miss Reimer testified that when she first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases