DAWLEY v. SHERIDAN-PUNARO CO.

36043.

93 Ga. App. 696 (1956)

92 S.E.2d 613

DAWLEY, by Next Friend, v. SHERIDAN-PUNARO COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided April 4, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell & Bell, for plaintiff in error.

Martin, Snow & Grant, Hendley V. Napier, contra.


FELTON, C. J.

The action is predicated on the "turntable" or attractive-nuisance doctrine. It has been held in cases too numerous to mention that the principle of the doctrine will not be extended. The instant case falls almost squarely within the holding in Manos v. Myers-Miller Furn. Co., 32 Ga.App. 644 (124 S. E. 357), where a child was killed when a tier of shelving upon which he was climbing fell, crushing the child.

We do not deem it necessary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases