Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
The ordinance affirmatively provides that no building shall be erected or altered for other than a conforming use and that a nonconforming use shall not be changed unless changed to a conforming use. It was a violation of the ordinance, therefore, to grant the application. Appellants Payne had a vested right to continue the use as it existed at the time of the enactment of the ordinance but had no right...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.