Insofar as the notice purported to be an appeal from the order entered October 17, 1955, it was properly rejected by the petitioner-respondent. Although it is characterized as an appeal from a motion to reargue, the notice may be read as a notice of appeal from the order entered November 22, 1955, which, according to the papers now before the court, appears to have been a disposition of a motion to intervene and vacate, as distinguished from a motion for reargument.
...Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
