DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. WASHINGTON POST COMPANY

Nos. 13007-13009.

235 F.2d 531 (1956)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Petitioner, v. The WASHINGTON POST COMPANY, Respondent. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Petitioner, v. WASHINGTON TIMES-HERALD, Inc., Respondent. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Petitioner, v. The WASHINGTON POST COMPANY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 14, 1956


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry Wixon, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, submitted on the brief for petitioner. Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corp. Counsel, Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and George C. Updegraff, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief for petitioner.

Mr. Fontaine C. Bradley, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. H. Marshall Peter, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, submitted on the brief for respondents.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner's principal though not its only contention is that Washington Times-Herald, Inc., v. District of Columbia, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 154, 213 F.2d 23, should be overruled. That case was decided by the court in banc. Before the present case was set for hearing, the petitioner had moved for a hearing in banc, largely on the ground of an alleged conflict between the Times-Herald case and the earlier case of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases